Shamrak.com

Special Anti-Semite is Sanctioned

The US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced new sanctions on the UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese who has been critical of Israel’s offensive in Gaza, and called for the International Criminal Court “to investigate and prosecute corporate executives and/or corporate entities.” “The United States will continue to take whatever actions we deem necessary to respond to law fare and protect our sovereignty and that of our allies,” Rubio said. Rubio called Albanese’s efforts to prompt criminal prosecution from the ICC and other actors “illegitimate and shameful.” (He could call her the "anti-Semite", as she actually is. She should be dismissed for her anti-Israel bias a long time ago, but she works for the 'Ugly Nazi'.)

In December 2023, Albanese called a demand that Hamas release the 251 hostages it kidnapped on October 7, including small children and a baby, "unacceptable." She has never called for the release of the hostages.

Albanese's anti-Israel bias was first exposed in 2022, in the form of anti-Semitic posts she made on social media, in which she claimed that the “Jewish lobby” controls the US.

Food for Thought: by Steven Shamrak

Since the time of the Crusaders the European rulers were propagating anti-Semitism among their subjects, as a tool of control and diverting blame, not just because of the religious dogma. Most of the Western democracies have been covertly doing the same. Since the 7th of October terror attack by Hamas on Israel, most of the Western TV and radio stations, as well as newspapers are allowed to report anti-Israel unchecked information-propaganda, provided by Hamas, with blatantly and deliberately bias against the Jewish state. In many Western democracies a generic term “Hate crime” is replacing “Antisemitism”. No wonder, there are so many non-Muslim ‘useful idiots’ who are participating in pro-Hamas/Palestinian demonstrations, or having anti-Israel feelings.  

Zionism is the Jewish

National Independence Movement

Hamas Rejects 60-day Ceasefire

Hamas rejected Qatari proposal for 60-day ceasefire and agreement, refusing to compromise, and waging a media war aimed at sabotaging the talks, misleading Gaza residents, and applying pressure on the public in Israel. The source noted that while Israel demonstrated flexibility, Hamas's refusal is preventing the mediators from advancing an agreement.

Israel Sets out Red Lines for End to War

Israel is ready to negotiate a lasting deal with Hamas to end the Gaza war when a temporary halt to hostilities begins, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. However, Hamas must first give up their weapons and their hold on Gaza. Indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas in Doha over a hostage deal and ceasefire are “on the verge of collapse,” despite recent optimism during Netanyahu’s visit to the US.

This is not Reported by Jew-Hating Press

A group of Jewish shepherds in the Benjamin region was attacked by dozens of Arab rioters, along with far-left anarchists on Friday afternoon. The attackers threw stones, used slingshots, damaged and burned agricultural equipment, and injured two of the Jewish shepherds.

The PA Police Officers are Terrorists

Two terrorists behind the deadly attack, combined shooting and stabbing attack at the Gush Etzion junction, Judea, who murdered 22-year-old Israeli Shalev Zevuloni, were members of the Palestinian Authority's security services. They recently returned to the West Bank after completing their studies in Qatar. Hamas spokesman for the Al-Qassam Brigades, Abu Obeida, congratulated the terrorists. (There is no difference between Hamas and the PA terrorists.)

Terrorists are not welcome in Israel

A bill banning terrorists and their families from becoming permanent Israeli residents by joining family members already legally in Israel passed into law in the Knesset. It also stipulates that any Palestinian who is caught jumping the border from Judea and Samaria will not receive a residency permit or even permission to stay temporarily in the country for ten years.

Hamas used Hospital to Attack IDF

Hamas used the European Hospital in Khan Younis as a base for combat operations and fired on Israeli troops from within the facility. Document found beneath European Hospital in Khan Younis details how a Hamas commander sealed a tunnel and left his fighters to die during clash with IDF troops. (Hamas terrorists use hospitals, schools and other civilian buildings. This makes them legitimate targets during the war.)

Resettlement Deal in Progress

Israeli Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the Jewish state and the United Nations are working together to find Middle Eastern countries in which Palestinians can relocate from Gaza and resettle. "I think President Trump had a brilliant vision," Netanyahu said. "It’s called free choice. If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave. It shouldn’t be a prison. It should be an open place and give people a free choice." President Donald Trump then chimed in, saying the United States and Israel have gotten "great cooperation" from Middle Eastern countries - "every single one of them."

Problem when the IDF Acts Political

- The Israel Defense Forces’ Military Advocate General has appealed a court ruling allowing Judea and Samaria municipalities to ban Palestinian workers from entering Jewish communities. Before the war, some 200,000 Palestinian workers were employed throughout the Jewish state, including 30,000 in Judea and Samaria.

- Netanyahu clashes with IDF chief over relocating Gaza civilians when IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir expressed scepticism over the plan to move Gazan civilians to the southern part of the Strip to allow the IDF to operate in the North. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich criticized Zamir for a so-called “stalemate” in Gaza and for public remarks the IDF chief made that the continuation of the war could endanger the hostages. (When army leadership contradiction to the government is politicly motivated, this is a threat to the country and democracy. Many IDF generals are still political appointees of the leftist Labor party.)

Quotes of the Week:

“Antisemitism is a persistent malice that has infected the United Nations Human Rights Council for far too long. Comments made by UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese that surfaced today are yet another stain on the credibility of this body and yet another example of the impunity that exists today regarding antisemitism and anti-Semitic comments made by UN officials,” - Israel’s mission to the UN in Geneva denounced Albanese’s comments - The UN, ‘Ugly Nazi’, inherited this anti-Semitic 'infection' from the League of Nations, and has 'proudly' caried it on since!

How to Spot the Signs of Lies

by Eva Migdal (FB post)

I asked ChatGPT: "How to spot the signs that something might not be fully true or trustworthy, especially when mainstream media or public opinion presents it as one-sided."

She answered: Here’s a clear summary of features or warning signs that should raise your curiosity or scepticism:

Signs a narrative may be unbalanced or not fully true

1. Over-simplicity: Complex topics are reduced to “good vs bad,” “right vs wrong,” or “us vs them.” There’s no space for nuance, uncertainty, or complexity.

2. Lack of dissenting voices: You notice all media outlets, experts, or influencers seem to be saying the same thing.

Opposing views are not just disagreed with, but mocked, silenced, or called “dangerous.”

3. Moral panic or emotional charge: The message relies heavily on fear, anger, guilt, or outrage. You’re told how you should feel - rather than being presented with evidence and allowed to decide.

4. Punishment or ridicule of questioners: Anyone who raises questions or offers a different view is labelled as ignorant, evil, conspiracy-minded, or dangerous.

There’s no space for open debate.

5. Over-reliance on authority: The message depends on statements like “experts say,” “trust the science,” or “the government has confirmed,” without explaining the actual reasoning or evidence behind it.

6. Absence of first-hand evidence: You only hear second- or third-hand accounts. Videos, testimonies, or raw data that contradict the main story are missing or actively removed.

7. Changing goalposts or shifting narratives: Over time, the official explanation or rules keep changing - but the contradictions are never acknowledged or explained.

8. Use of buzzwords and slogans: Instead of thoughtful arguments, you get catchy phrases, hashtags, or repeated soundbites.

 

Your support is appreciated

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/ShamrakReport